...

In search for order in the everyday chaos that surrounds me, and that moment of clarity comes only when review the photograph later. The act of capturing isn’t the moment of understanding—the camera is a notebook, a quiet companion that records fragments of life.  

Years ago, I heard Paolo Gioli’s idea: “I use the camera as a notebook.” That simple thought has guided my work ever since. Every time I raise my camera, I am drawn to something elusive—a detail that confuses, captivates, or even frightens me. I capture that moment without fully understanding it.  

Later, when I develop the images, a new reality emerges. I no longer see the scene as I experienced it, but as the camera, the lens, and the film captured it. The result feels like a shared creation—a collective work between me and my tools. The camera has its own way of seeing, its own intelligence, with the curious ability to reveal order from chaos.  

I shoot in the midst of disorder, but in development, I discover a hidden structure.  

I’ve never been interested in the idea of the photographer as a mere ‘eye’ or in chasing the ‘perfect composition.’ In fact, those ideas bore me. Instead, I’m drawn to uncertainty—the feeling that something out there isn’t quite right.  

There’s an unease about what’s considered normal, and I often wonder: is it really normal?  

Eggleston elevated the ordinary, turning boredom into something beautiful. But for me, the question is different: why does something is boring? And can that boredom be captured? It’s a difficult outcome to achieve because, when I develop the photo, something unexpected often emerges—and that chaos, where does it go?  

This is why I speak of chaos and order. I shoot amid the confusion of everyday life, and through the process of developing, my camera works against that chaos, quietly transforming it into something structured—a shared creation between me, the camera, and the film.  

Some of my thoughts 

Photography and Reality

Photography has long been considered a window to reality, a tool capable of capturing the tangible world and leaving behind a visible trace. If we think about it, every photograph is like a footprint: just as an imprint in the mud tells us something about who passed through that place at that moment, but a photograph is able to captures an infinite amount of detail, giving us the feeling of preserving and communicating not just the instant but an entire story. However, the landscape of photography is rapidly changing. With the rise of AI-generated images, this direct link between photography and reality is being questioned. As once Joan Fontcuberta noted, “Photography was born in the 19th century as a tool for verifying reality: what was photographed was real. Today, that function of reality authentication belongs to Google, and depending on the number of responses and how convincing they are, we come to believe it or not. But just as a photograph can be manipulated, so too can Google.” This parallel between photography and online searches highlights how, whether in photographic images or digital information, truth can be easily constructed and falsified. “What is the first step of a forger today?”

The Rhythm of Thought: Still Walking in Palermo

Ever wonder why a simple walk can lead to the best ideas? It’s an age-old Italian practice—the post-dinner stroll, or those spontaneous steps taken to share a moment or a conversation. For Italians, this is more than a leisurely activity; it’s a mental reset, a way to let thoughts flow as freely as the movement of your legs. Science backs this up. Stanford University’s research shows that walking can boost creative output by an impressive 60 percent. The American Psychological Association concurs, noting that walking stimulates the creative process, allowing the brain to wander and leading to those eureka moments. Now, imagine this: Palermo. A city designed for walking, where every turn and narrow alley feels like an invitation to get lost and find something unexpected. This city isn’t just a backdrop—it’s a participant in your stroll. Its labyrinthine streets and charming piazzas make each step a discovery, each moment a chance to pause and think. Unlike the vast, impersonal sprawl of modern cities, Palermo offers a human-sized experience. It’s a city where walking isn’t about navigating through a concrete jungle but about engaging with history, culture, and your own thoughts. This isn’t romantic nostalgia; it’s a lived reality. In

Embracing the Imperfect: My Encounter with an old Pentax Espio P

So, I found myself in possession of a Pentax Espio P, a relic from the days when cameras had weight and film had character. Deciding to give it a whirl, I loaded it with some Kodak film I had lying around. Little did I know, the lens had a bit of moisture and possibly some fungus. The result? Images that were slightly blurry, imbued with a soft, dreamy quality. And you know what? I loved it. Here’s the thing: the idea that a camera is a neutral tool, that it should capture reality exactly as it is, has always seemed absurd to me. A camera is an artist’s brush, a musician’s instrument—it interprets, it transforms. Just like a pencil or watercolors, different cameras and films bring their own unique flair. A Pentax Espio P with a funky lens gives you a hazy, nostalgic view of the world, and that’s its charm. We’ve lost something precious in the transition to digital photography. Digital cameras strive for perfection, for the flawless replication of reality. But who really wants reality as it is? We crave stories, emotions, the intangible essence that reality alone can’t provide. This obsession with digital clarity—free of noise, with

Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.